Consequentialist vs. non-consequentialist theories of ethics Show There are two broad categories of ethical theories concerning the source of value: consequentialist and non-consequentialist. A consequentialist theory of value judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based on the consequences that action has. The most familiar example would be utilitarianism--``that action is best that produces the greatest good for the greatest number'' (Jeremy Bentham). A non-consequentialist theory of value judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based on properties intrinsic to the action, not on its consequences. Libertarianism--People should be free to do as they like as long as they respect the freedom of others to do the same. Contractarianism--No policy that causes uncompensated harm on anyone is permitted (Pareto safety). Consider these Definitions: Teleology, consequentialism, and utility Teleology One religious, teleological theory suggests that the final goal of humanity is to love God, and to live a life of service to others. A different take on the nature of our moral "end" is that the fundamental goal of human behavior is to be happy -- the task then, of course, is to spell out exactly what human happiness consists in. Consequentialism Both teleological and consequentialist theories are types of theories. They are not themselves theories for one very important reason -- they don't specify what goals or consequences ought to guide moral judgments and actions. In other words, they are simply a couple of ways of categorizing ethical theories. Utility In short, then, Utilitarianism is a type of consequentialism, which is a type of teleological theory. READ: Teleological Theories: Consequentialist Approach READ: Deontological Theories: Non-Consequentialist Approach In the chapters that follow we shall cover these various ethical theories and their advantages and disadvantages or their weaknesses and problems Recommended textbook solutionsU.S. History1st EditionJohn Lund, Paul S. Vickery, P. Scott Corbett, Todd Pfannestiel, Volker Janssen 567 solutions America's History for the AP Course9th EditionEric Hinderaker, James A. Henretta, Rebecca Edwards, Robert O. Self 961 solutions Tonal Harmony, Workbook8th EditionByron Almen, Dorothy Payne, Stefan Kostka 1,387 solutions By the People: A History of the United States, AP EditionJames W. Fraser 496 solutions What is the difference between consequentialist and Nonconsequentialist theories?On the consequentialist view, people's interests are considered in terms of the total goodness or badness an action produces. On the non-consequentialist view, the moral status of a given individual might override the calculation of consequences.
What is Nonconsequentialist?Nonconsequentialism is a normative ethical theory which denies that the rightness or wrongness of our conduct is determined solely by the goodness or badness of the consequences of our acts or the rules to which those acts conform.
What is the difference between consequentialism and utilitarianism quizlet?What is the difference between consequentialism and utilitarianism? Consequentialists care about consequences, while utilitarians care about consequences concerning well-being or happiness.
What are consequentialist theories?Consequentialism is a type of teleological theory -- consequentialist theories suggest that the moral value, the moral rightness or wrongness of an act, is entirely a function of the consequences, or the results of that act.
|