In what ways was the 18th century Enlightenment the product of Scientific Revolution?

References

Anonymous, , Traité des Extremes ou élements de la science de la réalité (Amsterdam, 1768).Google Scholar

Baader, Franz Xaver, Vom Wärmestoff, seine Verteilung, Bindung und Entbindung vorzüglich beim Brennen der Körper (Vienna, 1786).Google Scholar

Baker, Keith, Condorcet: From Natural Philosophy to Social Mathematics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975)Google Scholar

Barthez, Paul, Nouvelle Méchanique des mouvements de l’homme et des animaux (Carcassone, 1798), p. v.Google Scholar

Barthez, PaulNouveaux élements de la science de l’homme, 2 vols. (Montpellier, 1778).Google Scholar

Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich, Elements of Physiology, Caldwell, Charles (trans.), 2 vols. (Philadelphia, 1795), 1.Google Scholar

Blumenbach, , Ueber den Bildungstrieb, 2nd ed. (Göttingen, 1791).Google Scholar

Blumenbach, , Ueber den Bildungstrieb (Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 1791).Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert, quoted by Westfall, Richard S., The Construction of Modern Science: Mechanism and Mechanists (Cambridge University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Brian, Eric, La mesure de l’Etat: adminstrateurs et geometres au XVIIIe siecle (Paris: Albin Michel, 1994)Google Scholar

Burg, Peter, Kant und die Französische Revolution (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1974).Google Scholar

Cabanis, Pierre-Jean-Georges, Physiologie des weib-lichen Geschlechts, trans. Michaelis, Christian (Berlin, 1786).Google Scholar

Cabanis, Pierre-Jean-Georges, Coup d’Oeil sur les Revolutions et sur la Réforme de la Médecine (Paris, 1804).Google Scholar

Darnton, Robert, The Forbidden Best-Sellers of Pre-Revolutionary France (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine, Classical Probability in the Enlightenment (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich, Göttingische Anzeigen von gelehrten Sachen, (1786).Google Scholar

Ferguson, Adam, An Essay on the History of Civil Society, ed. Forbes, Duncan (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1966).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Sheridan, Alan (New York: Random House, 1979).Google Scholar

Gough, J. B. “Lavoisier and the Fulfillment of the Stahlist Revolution,” in Donovan, Arthur (ed.), The Chemical Revolution: Essays in Chemical Revolution. Reinterpretation. Osiris, 2nd ser., vol. 4 (1988).Google Scholar

Hankins, Thomas L., “Eighteenth-Century Attempts to Resolve the Vis Viva Controversy,” Isis, 56 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horkheimer, Max, “Reason Against Itself: Some Remarks on Enlightenment,” in Schmidt, James (ed.), What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Humboldt, , in Wilhelm von Humboldt Werke, eds. Flitner, Andreas and Giel, Klaus, 5 vols. (Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta’sche Buchhandlung, 1980–1), 1.Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm, “On the Historian’s Task,” History and Theory, 6 (1967).Google Scholar

Hume, David, The Philosophical Works, eds. Green, Thomas Hill and Grose, Thomas Hodge, 4 vols. (London, 1883), 3.Google Scholar

Iltis, Carolyn (Merchant), “D’Alembert and the Vis Viva Controversy,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, I (1970)Google Scholar

Iltis, , “Madam du Chatelet’s Metaphysics and Mechanics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 8 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iltis, , “The Decline of Cartesianism in Mechanics: The Leibnizian-Cartesian Debates,” Isis, 64 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iltis, , “The Leibnizian-Newtonian Debates: Natural Philosophy and Social Psychology,” The British Journal for the History of Science, 6 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacob, Margaret C., The Radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons, and Republicans (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981)Google Scholar

Jardine, Nicholas, “Naturphilosophie and the Kingdoms of Nature,” in Jardine, Nicholas, Secord, J. A., and Spary, Emma C. (eds.), Cultures of Natural History (Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. KempSmith, Norman (New York, 1965)Google Scholar

Karstens, W. J. G., Physische-chemische Abhandlung, durch neuere Schriften von hermetischen Arbeiten und andere neue Untersuchungen veranlasset, 2 vols. (Halle, 1786, 1787), 2.Google Scholar

Kielmeyer, Carl Friedrich, Gesammelte Schriften: In Natur und Kraft. Die Lehre von der Entwicklung organische Naturlehre, Holler, F. H. (ed.) (Berlin: Keiper, 1938).Google Scholar

Krohn, Wolfgang and Küppers, Günther, “Die natürlichen Ursachen der Zwecke: Kants Ansätze der Selbstorganisation,” Selbstorganisation: Jahrbuch für Komplexität in den Natur-, Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften, 3 (1992).Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leclerc, George-Louis, Buffon, Comte, Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière, 36 vols. (Paris, 1749–89), 1.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, quoted in Rather, L. J. and Frerichs, J. B., “The Leibniz-Stahl Controversy – I. Leibniz Opening Objections to the Theorie medica vera” Clio Medica, 3 (1968).Google Scholar

Merchant, Carolyn, The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution (New York: Harper and Row, 1980)Google Scholar

Metzger, Hélène, Newton, Stahl, Boerhaave et la Doctrine Chimique (Paris: Félix Alcan, 1930).Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac, Query 31 of the Optics, in Thayer, H. S. (ed.), Newton’s Philosophy of Nature: Selections from His Writings (New York: Hafner Press, 1953).Google Scholar

Oken, Lorenz, Abriss der Naturphilosophie: Bestimmt zur Grundlage seiner Vorlesungen über Biologie (Göttingen, 1805).Google Scholar

Papineau, David, “The Vis Viva Controversy: Do Meanings Matter ?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 8 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popkin, and Zande, Johan, Skepticism in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998).Google Scholar

Rousseau, G. S. and Porter, Roy (eds.), The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Science (Cambridge University Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph, Erster Entwurf eines Systems der Naturphilosophie für Vorlesungen (Jena and Leipzig, 1799)Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich, quoted in Dewhurst, Kenneth and Reeves, Nigel (eds.), Frederick Schiller: Medicine, Psychology and Literature with the First English Edition of the Complete Medical and Physiological Writings (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Schor, Noami, “French Feminism Is a Universalism,” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies (1995)Google Scholar

Siegfried, Robert and Dobbs, Betty Jo in “Composition: A Neglected Aspect of the Chemical Revolution,” Annals of Science, 24 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stahl, Georg Ernst, Sudhoffs Klassiker der Medizin (Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth, 1961), 36Google Scholar

Thackray, Arnold, “Matter in a Nut-Shell: Newton’s Optics and Eighteenth-Century Chemistry,” Ambix, 15 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tonelli, Giorgio, “Analysis and Syntheses in XVIIIth Century Philosophy Prior to Kant” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 20 (1976)Google Scholar

Tonelli, , “Critiques of the Notion of Substance Prior to Kant,” Tijdschrift voor Philosophie, 23 (1961)Google Scholar

Tonelli, , “The Philosophy of d’Alembert: A Sceptic beyond Sceptism,” Kantstudien, 67 (1976).Google Scholar

Toulmin, Stephen, Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity (New York: Free Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Vartanian, Aram, La Méttrie’s L’Homme Machine: A Case Study in the Origins of an Idea (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1960).Google Scholar

How did the Scientific Revolution influence the enlightenment of the 18th century?

How did the Enlightenment influence the Scientific Revolution?

How was the enlightenment similar to the Scientific Revolution?