Do marine stickleback fish have bony armor and spines to protect them from predators?

Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Get Started

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
$19.50/month

Yearly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
$199/year

Log in through your institution

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $4.00 USD.

How does it work?

  1. Select the purchase option.
  2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
  3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

journal article

PREDATION-IMPOSED SELECTION ON THREESPINE STICKLEBACK (GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS) MORPHOLOGY: A TEST OF THE REFUGE USE HYPOTHESIS

Evolution

Vol. 65, No. 10 (OCTOBER 2011)

, pp. 2916-2926 (11 pages)

Published By: Society for the Study of Evolution

https://www.jstor.org/stable/41240877

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Alternate access options

For independent researchers

Read Online

Read 100 articles/month free

Subscribe to JPASS

Unlimited reading + 10 downloads

Purchase article

$4.00 - Download now and later

Abstract

The transition from marine to freshwater life in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) is accompanied by complex morphological changes—including reduction in bony armor and change in body shape—but experimental evidence for the selective agents behind these evolutionary transitions is sparse. We investigated whether selection by predatory fish affects threespine stickleback morphology differentially when refuge is absent (pelagic lifestyle—ancestral condition) or present (benthic lifestyle—derived condition). Our results show that selection favors low numbers of lateral plates in habitats with refuge, whereas fully plated individuals have a selective advantage in habitats without refuge. We also found that a decrease in the length of the caudal peduncle increased survival probability, irrespective of habitat. The effect of spine lengths on survival was evident only in a multivariate analysis of selection, implying that it is essential to account for phenotypic and genetic correlations between traits before drawing conclusions about the effects of selection on single traits. Apart from uncovering targets and patterns of predator-induced selection on threespine stickleback morphology, our results provide direct evidence to support the hypothesis that differences in antipredator strategies in pelagic versus benthic sticklebacks could play a role in the repeated, independent cases of plate number reduction following freshwater colonization in this species.

Journal Information

Evolution, published for the Society for the Study of Evolution, is the premier publication devoted to the study of organic evolution and the integration of the various fields of science concerned with evolution. The journal presents significant and original results that extend our understanding of evolutionary phenomena and processes.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Evolution © 2011 Society for the Study of Evolution
Request Permissions

SCIENTIFIC NAME Gasterosteus aculeatus

TAXONOMY PHYLUM: Chordata CLASS: Actinopterygii ORDER: Gasterosteiformes FAMILY: Gasterosteidae

General description

Do marine stickleback fish have bony armor and spines to protect them from predators?

Credit: hailshadow/Getty

Three-spined sticklebacks are small bony fish that have prominent spines for protection against predators. The fish occupies widespread habitats and can be found in both marine and freshwater parts of the Northern hemisphere1. Since the end of the last Ice Age, marine sticklebacks have colonized many new freshwater lakes and streams in formerly glaciated regions. This recent adaptation in response to dramatic ecological change has recurred in many locations within 10-20,000,000 years. Because the stickleback has undergone repeated adaptation to divergent marine-freshwater environments, the species exhibits multiple examples of parallel evolution1.

Husbandry

Sticklebacks are normally found in cool northern environments covering a range of pH and salinities. Wild fish use a paternal care system, with males building nests, recruiting females, fertilizing external clutches of a few dozen to several hundred eggs, and fanning eggs during the week or so before hatching. In the laboratory, both marine and freshwater fish can be raised from eggs to fertile adults in 6 to 12 months at temperatures of 16–18 °C, a salinity of 3.5 parts per thousand (55,00-60,000 μS), and pH between 6.5 and 7.5. Since wild fish occupy a wide range of environments, many populations can likely tolerate parameters outside of these ranges. In laboratory settings, in vitro fertilization can be used to replace natural matings and overcome reproductive barriers between populations. Housing density is partly dependent upon the system's filtration efficiency, but a useful rule of thumb is 2 cm of fish per liter of water. Possible laboratory diets include Daphnia, brine shrimp, mysis shrimp, and bloodworms. Detailed descriptions of common husbandry procedures for sticklebacks are available (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jeffrey_Divino/publication/280076726_Juvenile_Threespine_Stickleback_Husbandry_Standard_Operating_Procedures_of_the_Schultz_Lab/links/55a67ea508ae410caa74d8f0.pdf).

Research résumé

Scientists have selected three-spined stickleback as a model for ecological and genetics research in part because the species has undergone one of the most recent and dramatic evolutionary radiations on earth. Different forms show striking changes in size, body armor, teeth, craniofacial structures, dorsal spines, pelvic development, pigmentation, salt handling, parasite resistance, social and reproductive behavior, and many life history traits1. Despite these major morphological and physiological differences, many recently evolved populations can still be crossed, making it possible to map particular chromosome regions that control interesting phenotypic differences2. The three-spined stickleback genome has been sequenced, facilitating the study of chromosome regions and genes that contribute to phenotypic differences3. Researchers have also developed methods for adding and removing genes in sticklebacks, making it possible to transfer traits and confirm the effects of particular genes and mutations2.

The diversity of fossil and living stickleback populations adds to the value of these fish as an evolutionary, ecological, and environmental model4. Interactions between fish and other organisms can be studied in a range of environments, ranging from laboratory aquaria, artificial ponds, common garden experiments, or natural lakes and streams followed over time5. Host-parasite interactions have been studied in sticklebacks since they possess a well-documented parasite fauna, and different populations show marked variation in parasite susceptibility6. The stickleback is also an emerging model for environmental biomonitoring, with wide distribution as a native species, simple DNA markers for molecular sex determination, clear biomarkers for exposure to androgens and endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and reports of intersex fish7.

References

  1. Bell, M.A. & Foster, S.A. (eds.) The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kingsley, D.M. & Peichel, C.L. in Biology of the Three-Spined Stickleback. (eds. Ostlund-Nilsson, S., Mayer, I. & Huntingford, F.A.) 41–81 (CRC Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jones, F.C. et al. The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 484, 55–61 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibson, G. The synthesis and evolution of a supermodel. Science 307, 1890–1891 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnegard, M.E. et al. Genetics of ecological divergence during speciation. Nature 511, 307–311 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Iain, B. Sticklebacks as model hosts in ecological and evolutionary parasitology. Trend. Parasitol. 29, 556–566 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Katsiadaki, I. et al. Three-spined stickleback: an emerging model in environmental endocrine disruption. Environ. Sci. 14, 263–283 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

  1. Kathleen Heng

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abbey Thompson

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Chu

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David M. Kingsley

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heng, K., Thompson, A., Chu, D. et al. Three cheers for the three-spined stickleback. Lab Anim 45, 421 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1142

Download citation

  • Published: 20 October 2016

  • Issue Date: November 2016

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1142

Do marine sticklebacks have spines?

Sticklebacks in marine environments typically have long spines that form part of their skeletal armor. Many derived freshwater populations have evolved shorter spines.

How does the stickleback armor protect the fish from some predators?

Stickleback fish develop bony plates on their surface to protect themselves from predators. The extent and pattern of their bony armor depends on their habitat: marine sticklebacks are typically covered from head to tail with bony plates, but freshwater sticklebacks retain only a few plates on their sides.

What is the purpose of the spines of sticklebacks?

The many stickleback populations underwent disparate and parallel evolutionary changes, among them partial or complete loss of their pelvic spines. These spines are thought to protect the fish from being devoured by predators.

What armor do stickleback fish have?

Sticklebacks lack scales. Instead, most have body armor that is believed to protect threespine sticklebacks against predatory fish. The armor--made of more than 30 bony plates on each side--extends from just behind the head to the tail on threespine sticklebacks.