Which of the following heart muscle diseases is unrelated to other cardiovascular disease?

Cardiovascular Problems of the Neonate

Richard J. Martin MBBS, FRACP, in Fanaroff and Martin's Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, 2020

Myocardial Diseases: Cardiomyopathy and Myocarditis

Cardiomyopathy refers to a diverse group of myocardial diseases with multiple causes. These are rare disorders that account for only approximately 1% of childhood cardiac disease. In 1995, the World Health Organization classified cardiomyopathies into hypertrophic, dilated, restrictive, and mixed type.63 This classification is based on the pathophysiology of the disease. However, with rapid evolution of molecular genetics in cardiology, the American Heart Association in 2006 has classified cardiomyopathies into two major groups based on predominant organ involvement and etiology.48 Primary cardiomyopathies are those solely or predominantly confined to heart muscle and are relatively few in number (Fig. 76.3). Secondary cardiomyopathies show pathologic myocardial involvement as part of a large number and variety of generalized systemic (multiorgan) disorders (Box 76.1).48 Myocarditis, an inflammatory, usually infectious process affecting the myocardium, may also result in either a dilated (common) or restrictive (rare) cardiomyopathy.

Dilated cardiomyopathy is characterized by left ventricular enlargement, with systolic dysfunction of either the left ventricle or both ventricles causing variable degrees of congestive heart failure. The patient's cardiac output (heart rate × stroke volume) is often decreased, and ventricular filling pressures are increased. Total ventricular mass is increased, but chamber volume is disproportionately enlarged. These neonates present with symptoms of poor cardiac output, including pallor, irritability, poor feeding, respiratory distress, and diaphoresis. Physical signs include tachypnea, tachycardia, narrow pulse pressure, and hepatomegaly. Decompensated infants will present with shock and cardiovascular collapse. Cardiac auscultation often reveals muffled heart sounds with a gallop rhythm (S3, S4). Occasionally, a murmur of mitral regurgitation can be auscultated. Arrhythmias, although rare, are an ominous, often undetected presentation.64 The electrocardiogram in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy shows flattening of the T waves with possible depression of the ST segments. The chest x-ray often shows cardiomegaly with pulmonary edema. Echocardiogram is diagnostic, illustrating dilation of the ventricle(s) and poor cardiac contractility. Cardiac MRI is increasingly part of the diagnostic work-up, often demonstrating myocardial fibrosis and scarring. MRI has become useful in differentiating dilated cardiomyopathy from acute myocarditis, both of which can appear clinically and echocardiographically nearly identical. An extensive family history is essential when evaluating neonates, specifically asking for the first-degree relatives with dilated cardiomyopathy, metabolic disorders, degenerative neurologic diseases, or diseases of mitochondria. The management of these patients involves targeting the body's neurohormonal activation during heart failure, including spironolactone and loop diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or receptor blockers, and inotropes for acute decompensation. There is conflicting data in neonates and infants for use of beta-blockers in management of dilated cardiomyopathy, with many experienced institutions continuing to add carvedilol to augment medical management.58 The primary goal of therapy is to relieve symptoms and prolong survival. Often, these patients may require the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and/or ventricular assist device (VAD) as a bridge to recovery or transplant. As mechanical support technology has improved, ventricular assist devices have demonstrated improvement in survival over ECMO.26 All forms of mechanical support have a high incidence of adverse event rates, particularly hemorrhage and thrombosis events in children under 10 kg.46

Cardiomyopathies

José Marín-García M.D., in Post-Genomic Cardiology (Second Edition), 2014

Cardiomyopathies—diseases of heart muscle—may result from an array of factors, mainly genetic, that will impair myocardial function leading to heart failure (HF). With the development of new sequence technologies following the human genome project (HGP), genetic evaluation of cardiomyopathies has exponentially increased. Numerous mutations have been identified as etiological factors in the more prevalent types of cardiomyopathy, that is, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and also recently in other, more uncommon phenotypes, such as restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM), arhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/ARVC), noncompaction LV (NLVCM), stress cardiomyopathy (SCM), mitochondrial cardiomyopathy (MCM), and Danon cardiomyopathy (DCM). Increasingly, genetic defects have been also found in metabolic cardiomyopathies (i.e., diabetes), which often present with extracardiac manifestations. These genetic defects involve numerous intracellular pathways and they share a number of critical features as well as distinct elements fostering the various cardiomyopathic phenotypes, such as those arising from sporadic and acquired cardiomyopathies resulting from infection (e.g., viral induced), toxins (e.g., alcohol), and ischemic insult. In this chapter, we will review recent and contemporary research on CMs, including their etiology, mechanisms, clinical diagnosis, and potential therapies.

Read full chapter

URL: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124045996000123

Diseases of the Myocardium and Endocardium

Lee Goldman MD, in Goldman-Cecil Medicine, 2020

Myocardial Disease

A substantial minority of cases of heart failure result from familial (genetic) or nonfamilial (acquired) disorders, which can be confined to the heart or be multisystem disorders. The termcardiomyopathy refers to myocardial disorders in which the heart muscle is structurally and functionally abnormal in the absence of coronary artery disease (Chapter 64), hypertension (Chapter 70), valvular disease (Chapter 66), or congenital heart disease (Chapter 61) sufficient to cause the observed myocardial abnormality. Cardiomyopathies are classified according to ventricular morphology and pathophysiology into four major types: dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (Table 54-1 andFig. 54-1). Diseases that do not fit into these groups (such as endocardial fibroelastosis and left ventricular noncompaction) are termed unclassified cardiomyopathies. Mixed phenotypes can exist; for example, patients with hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathies frequently have a restrictive left ventricular physiology or develop ventricular dilation.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Definition and Epidemiology

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is defined as unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy in the absence of abnormal loading conditions (valve disease, hypertension, congenital heart defects) sufficient to explain the degree of hypertrophy.1 The disease occurs in all racial groups, with a prevalence of between 0.2 and 0.5%.

Pathobiology

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is usually familial with autosomal dominant inheritance. Mutations in sarcomeric contractile protein genes (E-Table 54-1 andE-Table 54-2) account for approximately 50 to 60% of cases. More than 1400 different mutations have been identified, with marked variation in disease penetrance and clinical expression. A similar clinical phenotype is seen in association with other uncommon genetic disorders, including Noonan syndrome (Chapter 61), Friedreich ataxia (Chapter 393), neurofibromatosis (Chapter 389), hereditary spherocytosis (Chapter 152), respiratory chain disorders, glycogen storage diseases (Chapter 196), and lysosomal storage disorders (Chapter 197), especially Fabry disease.2

E-TABLE 54-1. GENETIC CAUSES OF CARDIOMYOPATHY

PROTEIN NAMEGENE SYMBOLINHERITANCEPHENOTYPEESTIMATED FREQUENCY
SARCOMERIC PROTEINS
Cardiac β-myosin heavy chain MYH7 AD HCM; DCM; LVNC; RCM; Laing distal myopathy HCM 30-40%; DCM 4-6%
Cardiac myosin-binding protein C MYBPC3 AD HCM; DCM; LVNC HCM 30-40%; DCM ∼1%
Cardiac troponin T TNNT2 AD HCM, DCM, RCM HCM 10-15%; DCM 3-5%
Cardiac troponin I TNNI3 HCM: AD; DCM: AD, AR HCM; RCM; DCM HCM 2-5%; RCM frequent; DCM <1%
α-Tropomyosin TPM1 AD HCM; DCM HCM ∼1-2%; DCM <1%
Regulatory myosin light chain MYL2 AD HCM; DCM HCM ∼1%; DCM rare
Cardiac actin ACTC1 AD LVNC; DCM; HCM; CHD DCM ∼1%; HCM ∼1%
Essential myosin light chain MYL3 AD HCM; DCM Rare
Cardiac troponin C TNNC1 AD HCM; DCM HCM <1%;
Actin, alpha 1, skeletal muscle ACTA1 AD HCM, DCM, skeletal/nemaline myopathy Rare
SARCOMERE AND Z-DISC–RELATED PROTEINS
Titin TTN AD DCM; LVNC; skeletal myopathy DCM 15-25%
BCL2-associated athanogene 3 BAG3 AD DCM; skeletal myopathy 2-4%
FH1/FH2 domain-containing protein 3 FHOD3 AD HCM HCM 1-2%
Titin-cap or telethonin TCAP AD HCM; DCM; skeletal myopathy Rare
Cysteine and glycine-rich protein 3 (cardiac LIM protein) CSRP3 AD; AR HCM; DCM Rare
Four-and-a-half LIM protein 1 FHL1 AD DCM; RCM; CCD Rare
Myozenin 2 MYOZ2 AD HCM Rare
CYTOSKELETAL PROTEINS
Desmin DES AD, AR DCM; RCM; ACM; skeletal myopathy; CCD DCM <1%
Filamin C FLNC AD ACM; DCM; RCM; skeletal myopathy DCM 1%; ACM ∼5%
Dystrophin DMD XL DCM; skeletal myopathy DCM <1%
Caveolin-3 CAV3 AD HCM; DCM; skeletal myopathy Rare
α-B crystallin CRYAB AD DCM; skeletal myopathy Rare
α-, β-, γ-, and δ-sarcoglycans SGCA, SGCB, SGCG, SGCD AR; SGCD: AD DCM; muscular dystrophy Rare
Striated muscle preferentially expressed protein kinase SPEG AR DCM; skeletal myopathy Rare
NUCLEAR PROTEINS
Lamin A/C LMNA AD DCM; skeletal myopathy; CCD; ACM DCM 4-8%
Emerin EMD XL recessive DCM; skeletal myopathy; CCD DCM <1%
Dystrobrevin alpha DTNA AD DCM; LVNC Rare
α-Kinase 3 deficiency ALPK3 AR/AD HCM; DCM Rare
PR domain-containing protein 16 PRDM16 AD LVNC; DCM Rare
Transmembrane protein 43 TMEM43 AD ACM; DCM; skeletal myopathy Rare
ION CHANNEL AND ION CHANNEL RELATED
Cardiac sodium channel SCN5A AD DCM; CCD; Brugada Syndrome, LQTS DCM <1%
Potassium/sodium hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 4 HCN4 AD LVNC; CCD; Brugada syndrome Rare
Regulatory SUR2A subunit of the cardiac K(ATP) channel ABCC9 AD DCM; HCM in Cantú syndrome Rare
Anoctamin-5 ANO5 AR DCM; skeletal myopathy Rare
Voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1C CACNA1C AD HCM in Timothy syndrome; LQTS Rare
DESMOSOMAL PROTEINS
Plakophilin 2 PKP2 AD, AR ARVC; DCM AD 30-40%; AR rare
Desmoglein 2 DSG2 AD ARVC; ACM; DCM 12-40%
Desmoplakin DSP ARVC: AD; Carvajal syndrome: AR ACM; ARVC; DCM in Carvajal syndrome ACM/ARVC 6-39%
Desmocollin 2 DSC2 AD ARVC Rare
Junction plakoglobin JUP ARVC: AD; Naxos disease: AR ARVC in Naxos disease Rare
Phospholamban PLN AD ACM; DCM; HCM DCM founder effect in Holland, otherwise rare
Junctophilin 2 JPH2 AD HCM Rare
Cardiac ryanodine receptor RYR2 AD LVNC in CPVT (del exon 3) Rare
METABOLIC PROTEINS
Amylo-1,6-glucosidase AGL AR HCM in Forbes disease Rare
Acid α-1,4-glucosidase GAA AR HCM, DCM in Pompe disease Rare
α-Galactosidase A GLA XL dominant HCM in Anderson-Fabry disease Rare
Lysosomal-associated membrane protein 2 LAMP2 XL dominant HCM, DCM in Danon disease Rare
Protein kinase, AMP- activated, γ2 noncatalytic subunit PRKAG2 AD HCM; Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome Rare
Frataxin FXN AR HCM in Friedreich ataxia Rare
Hereditary hemochromatosis HFE AR DCM and RCM in hereditary hemochromatosis Rare
Mitochondrial genes encoding mitochondrial components MT-TG, MT-TY, MT-ND5, others Maternal HCM in MELAS, MERRF, LHON syndromes Rare
Dolichol kinase DOLK AR DCM Rare
Tafazzin TAZ XL recessive DCM; LVNC in Barth syndrome Rare
1-Acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase beta AGPAT2 AR HCM in Berardinelli-Seip syndrome Rare
Fumarylacetoacetase FAH AR HCM Rare
Beta-galactosidase GLB1 AR HCM in Morquio syndrome A Rare
Beta-glucuronidase GUSB AR HCM in mucopolysaccharidosis VII Rare
Glycogenin-1 GYG1 AR HCM; DCM; skeletal myopathy Rare
Malonyl-CoA decarboxylase, mitochondrial MLYCD AR HCM; LVNC; DCM Rare
Phosphopantothenate--cysteine ligase PPCS AR DCM Rare
Solute carrier family 22 member 5 SLC22A5 AR HCM, DCM long and short QT in primary systemic carnitine deficiency Rare
Alanine--tRNA ligase, mitochondrial AARS2 AR HCM, DCM in combined oxidative phosphorylation deficiency 8 Rare
Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family member 9, mitochondrial ACAD9 AR HCM/DCM in mitochondrial complex I deficiency Rare
Very long-chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial ACADVL AR HCM/DCM in very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency Rare
Acylglycerol kinase, mitochondrial AGK AR HCM in Sengers syndrome Rare
ATP synthase mitochondrial F1 complex assembly factor 2 ATPAF2 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
Cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 5 COA5 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
Cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 6 homolog COA6 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
4-hydroxybenzoate polyprenyltransferase, mitochondrial COQ2 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
Cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein COX15 homolog COX15 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6B1 COX6B1 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
Dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase, mitochondrial DLD AR Syndromic HCM Rare
Mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit TIM14 DNAJC19 AR Syndromic DCM; LVNC Rare
Zinc phosphodiesterase ELAC protein 2 ELAC2 AR Syndromic HCM; DCM Rare
FAD-dependent oxidoreductase domain-containing protein 1 FOXRED1 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
Elongation factor G, mitochondrial GFM1 AR Syndromic DCM; HCM; CHD Rare
Lipoyl synthase, mitochondrial LIAS AR HCM in Leigh syndrome Rare
39S ribosomal protein L3, mitochondrial MRPL3 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
39S ribosomal protein L44, mitochondrial MRPL44 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
28S ribosomal protein S22, mitochondrial MRPS22 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
Protein MTO1 homolog, mitochondrial MTO1 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
Inorganic pyrophosphatase 2, mitochondrial PPA2 AR Syndromic DCM Rare
Glutamyl-tRNA(Gln) amidotransferase subunit A, mitochondrial QRSL1 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
Protein SCO2 homolog, mitochondrial SCO2 AR/AD Syndromic HCM Rare
Succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein subunit, mitochondrial SDHA AR LVNC; DCM; HCM in Leigh Syndrome Rare
Phosphate carrier protein, mitochondrial SLC25A3 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
Surfeit locus protein 1 SURF1 AR DCM, HCM in Leigh syndrome Rare
Transmembrane protein 70, mitochondrial TMEM70 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
ADP/ATP translocase 1 SLC25A4 AR/AD Syndromic HCM; encephalopathy Rare
Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit alpha, somatic form, mitochondrial PDHA1 XL dominant HCM, CCD Rare
Phosphorylase b kinase regulatory subunit alpha, skeletal muscle isoform PHKA1 XL HCM Rare
Seipin BSCL2 AR HCM in Berardinelli-Seip syndrome Rare
Phosphomannomutase 2 PMM2 AR Syndromic HCM Rare
OTHER GENES
RNA-binding protein 20 RBM20 AD DCM; LVNC 3-5%
Homeobox protein Nkx-2.5 NKX2-5 AD LVNC; CHD <1%
Muscle RING Finger 1 (MuRF1) TRIM63 AR HCM; skeletal myopathy Rare
Transcription factor TBX20 TBX20 AD DCM; LVNC; CHD <1%
Hereditary amyloidosis TTR AD HCM and RCM in hereditary amyloidosis Rare
Alström syndrome protein 1 ALMS1 AR DCM in Alström syndrome Rare
Eyes absent 4 EYA4 AD DCM Rare
Fukutin-related protein FKRP AD, AR DCM; skeletal myopathy Rare
Fukutin FKTN AD, AR DCM; skeletal myopathy Rare
F-box only protein 32 FBXO32 AR DCM Rare
Laminin α2 LAMA2 AR DCM; skeletal myopathy Rare
Transcription factor GATA-4 GATA4 AD DCM; CHD Rare
Transcription factor GATA-6 GATA6 AD DCM; CHD Rare
Kelch-like protein 24 KLHL24 AD/AR DCM in epidermolysis bullosa Rare
Cardiotrophin 1 CTF1 AD DCM Rare
αT-catenin CTNNA3 AD ARVC; ACM Rare
RAS-MAPK pathway PTPN11, RAF1, SOS1, KRAS, HRAS, BRAF, NRAS, MEK1-2, RIT1, SHOC2, SOS2, SPRY1, others AD-de novo HCM in Noonan, LEOPARD, Costello and CFC syndromes Rare
Leucine-zipper-like transcriptional regulator 1 LZTR1 AR HCM in Noonan syndrome Rare
Dual specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 MAP2K1 AD HCM in CFC syndrome Rare
Dual specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 2 MAP2K2 AD HCM in CFC syndrome Rare
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CBL CBL AD HCM in Noonan-like syndrome Rare
Non-POU domain-containing octamer-binding protein NONO XL-dominant LVNC; CHD Rare
Pleckstrin homology domain PLEKHM2 AR DCM; LVNC Rare

ACM = arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; ARVC = arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy; CCD = cardiac conduction disease; CFC = cardiofaciocutaneous; CPVT = catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia; CHD = congenital heart disease; DCM = dilated cardiomyopathy; HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LQTS = long QT syndrome; LVNC = left ventricular noncompaction; RCM = restrictive cardiomyopathy; XL = X-linked.

E-TABLE 54-2. PUBLISHED CANDIDATE GENES ASSOCIATED WITH CARDIOMYOPATHY

PROTEIN NAMEGENE SYMBOLINHERITANCEPHENOTYPEESTIMATED FREQUENCY
SARCOMERIC PROTEINS
Myotilin MYOT AD DCM Rare
Cardiac α-myosin heavy chain MYH6 AD DCM; HCM; CHD Rare
Muscle-related coiled-coil protein MURC / CAVIN4 AD DCM; HCM Rare
SARCOMERE AND Z-DISC–RELATED PROTEINS
Ankyrin repeat domain- containing protein 1 ANKRD1 AD DCM Rare
Cadherin-2 CDH2 AD/de novo ACM Rare
LIM domain-binding protein 3 LDB3 AD LVNC; DCM; HCM; skeletal myopathy Rare
Myopalladin MYPN AD; AR HCM; skeletal myopathy Rare
Nexilin NEXN AD HCM; DCM Rare
Nebulette NEBL AD DCM; LVNC Rare
PDZ and LIM domain protein 3 PDLIM3 AD DCM; HCM Rare
 Vinculin VCL AD DCM; HCM Rare
Four-and-a-half LIM domains protein 2 FHL2 AD DCM Rare
Tight junction protein 1 TJP1 AD ACM Rare
Myosin-binding protein H-like MYBPHL AD DCM; CCD Rare
Myomesin 1 MYOM1 AD HCM Rare
Myomesin 2 MYOM2 AD HCM Rare
CALCIUM-HANDLING PROTEINS
Calsequestrin 2 (cardiac muscle) CASQ2 AD LVNC; HCM; CPVT Rare
Calreticulin-3 CALR3 AD HCM; ARVC; HCM Rare
NUCLEAR PROTEINS
Spectrin repeat containing, nuclear envelope 1 SYNE1 AD; AR DCM in Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy Rare
Spectrin repeat containing, nuclear envelope 2 SYNE2 AD DCM in Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy Rare
ION CHANNEL AND ION CHANNEL RELATED
ATP-sensitive inward rectifier potassium channel 8 KCNJ8 AD/de novo HCM; DCM in Cantú syndrome Rare
OTHER GENES
Zinc finger protein castor homolog 1 CASZ1 AD HCM; CHD Rare
Myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2C MEF2C AD DCM; CHD Rare
RelA-associated inhibitor PPP1R13L AR ACM; DCM Rare
Tumor protein p63 TP63 AD ACM Rare
Zinc finger and BTB domain-containing protein 17 ZBTB17 AD DCM Rare
Serine/threonine-protein kinase TNNI3K TNNI3K AD DCM; CCD Rare
M2 muscarinic receptor CHRM2 AD DCM Rare
GATA zinc finger domain-containing protein 1 GATAD1 AR DCM Rare
Laminin α4 LAMA4 AD DCM Rare
Integrin-linked kinase ILK AD DCM; ACM Rare
Myosin light chain kinase 2 MYLK2 AD HCM Rare
Presenilin 1 PSEN1 AD DCM; Alzheimer disease Rare
Presenilin 2 PSEN2 AD DCM; Alzheimer disease Rare
Transforming growth factor β3 TGFB3 AD ARVC Rare

ACM = arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; ARVC = arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy; CCD = cardiac conduction disease; CFC = cardiofaciocutaneous; CPVT = catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia; CHD = congenital heart disease; DCM = dilated cardiomyopathy; HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LVNC = left ventricular noncompaction; XL = X-linked.

Pathology

In the common form of autosomal dominant hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myocardial hypertrophy usually affects the interventricular septum more than other regions of the left ventricle. Other patterns, including concentric, midventricular (sometimes associated with a left ventricular apical diverticulum), and apical, also occur. Coexistent right ventricular hypertrophy is present in up to 44% of cases. The papillary muscles are often poorly developed and may be displaced anteriorly, thereby contributing to systolic anterior motion of the anterior mitral valve leaflet in 25% of patients and of the posterior leaflets in 10% of cases in the resting state. Often, the mitral valve is structurally abnormal, with elongation of the anterior leaflet and occasional direct insertion of the papillary muscle into the anterior leaflet. The histologic hallmark of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a triad of myocyte hypertrophy, myocyte disarray, and interstitial fibrosis. Myocyte disarray refers to architectural disorganization of the myocardium, with adjacent myocytes aligned obliquely or perpendicular to each other in association with increased interstitial collagen. The myofibrillar architecture within the myocyte is also disorganized. Although myocyte disarray occurs in aortic stenosis, long-standing hypertension, and some forms of congenital heart disease, the presence of extensive disarray (more than 10% of ventricular septal myocytes) is thought to be a highly specific marker for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Small intramural coronary arteries are often dysplastic and narrowed because of wall thickening by smooth muscle cell hyperplasia.

Pathophysiology

Abnormal ventricular geometry, wall thickening, myocyte hypertrophy, myocyte and myofibrillar disarray, and myocardial fibrosis all contribute to impairment of left ventricular diastolic function. The net result is elevation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressures, symptoms of heart failure, and reduced exercise tolerance. Global measures of left ventricular systolic function are often normal, but regional myocardial dysfunction and progressive systolic impairment are relatively common.

Approximately 25% of patients have left ventricular outflow tract obstruction at rest caused by contact between the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve and the interventricular septum during ventricular systole. Many patients without outflow obstruction at rest develop it during physiologic and pharmacologic interventions that reduce left ventricular end-diastolic volume or increase left ventricular contractility.

Clinical Manifestations

Most patients are asymptomatic or have only mild or intermittent symptoms. Symptomatic progression is usually slow, age related, and associated with a gradual deterioration in left ventricular function during decades. Less than 5% of patients may have rapid, symptomatic deterioration. Symptoms can develop at any age, even many years after the appearance of electrocardiographic (ECG) or echocardiographic manifestations of left ventricular hypertrophy. On occasion, sudden death may be the initial presentation. However, most individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have few if any symptoms, and the diagnosis is often made as a result of family screening or the incidental detection of a heart murmur or ECG abnormality.

Approximately 20 to 30% of adults develop chest pain (Chapters 45 and62), which may occur on exertion, at rest, or nocturnally. Postprandial angina associated with mild exertion is typical. Mild to moderate dyspnea on exertion is relatively common, and some patients develop paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea that may be caused by transient myocardial ischemia or arrhythmia. Approximately 20% of patients experience syncope (Chapters 45 and56), and a similar proportion complain of presyncope. Palpitations (Chapter 56) are frequent and are usually attributable to supraventricular or ventricular ectopy or to forceful cardiac contraction. Sustained palpitations are usually caused by supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, but initial presentation with a symptomatic arrhythmia is uncommon. Patients with distal or apical hypertrophy have fewer symptoms and arrhythmias, better exercise capacity, and good prognosis.On occasion, however, patients with distal or apical hypertrophy may have severe refractory chest pain or may present with troublesome supraventricular arrhythmias.

Diagnosis

A three- to four-generation family history, which should be obtained in all patients with a new diagnosis of cardiomyopathy, helps determine the probability of familial disease and its mode of inheritance. The initial diagnostic evaluation includes a family history focusing on premature cardiac disease or death, a comprehensive medical history focusing on cardiovascular symptoms, a careful physical examination, a 12-lead electrocardiogram, and a two-dimensional echocardiogram.3

The general evaluation may provide diagnostic clues in patients whose hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is associated with syndromes or metabolic disorders. For example, Noonan syndrome is characterized by short stature, developmental delay, cutaneous abnormalities (cafe au lait spots), hypertelorism, ptosis, low-set posteriorly rotated ears, and webbed neck. These features are shared with the less common LEOPARD syndrome. Angiokeratomas, anhidrosis, Raynaud-like symptoms with neuropathy, cornea verticillata, retinal vascular dilation, tinnitus, diarrhea, and proteinuria are typical features of Fabry disease (Chapter 197).3b

Clinical examination of the cardiovascular system is often normal. In the presence of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, the arterial pulse has a rapid upstroke and downstroke (sometimes with a bisferiens character), the apex beat is sustained or double (reflecting a palpable atrial impulse followed by left ventricular contraction), and auscultation will demonstrate a systolic ejection murmur that is heard loudest at the left sternal edge and that radiates to the right upper sternal edge and apex (Chapter 45). Most patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction also have the murmur of mitral regurgitation, which results from failure of the mitral valve leaflets to coapt due to the systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve. Physiologic and pharmacologic maneuvers that decrease afterload or venous return (e.g., standing, Valsalva maneuver,inhalation of amyl nitrite) or increase contractility (e.g., a post-extrasystole beat) will increase the intensity of the murmur, whereas interventions that increase afterload and venous return (e.g., squatting or handgrip) will reduce it (seeTable 45-8). In contrast, physical signs in most patients who do not have left ventricular outflow tract obstruction are subtle and are limited to features that reflect the hyperdynamic contraction (rapid upstroke pulse) and poorly compliant right (prominenta wave in jugular venous pressure) and left (S4 gallop, double-apex beat) ventricles (Chapter 45).

Diagnostic Testing

More than 95% of patients have abnormal ECG findings, but no changes are disease specific. The most common abnormalities are increased QRS voltage consistent with left ventricular hypertrophy, left axis deviation (15 to 20%), abnormal Q waves (25 to 30%, most commonly in inferolateral leads), and ST segment or T wave changes (>50%). An isolated increase in the QRS voltage without ST segment changes or T wave inversion is rare in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The presence of predominantly distal or apical thickening is associated with giant negative T wave inversion, which is maximal in leads V3 and V4.

Two-dimensional echocardiography (Chapter 49) is the mainstay of diagnostic imaging, but magnetic resonance imaging (Chapter 50) and computed tomography (Chapter 50) provide alternatives if the echocardiogram is of poor quality. In most patients, the hypertrophy is asymmetric and involves the anterior and posterior intraventricular septum (Fig. 54-2). The hypertrophy, however, may be more generalized and involve the free wall of the left ventricle, or it may be localized and confined to areas other than the septum, such as the lateral or posterior wall of the left ventricle. The echocardiogram can measure left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, both at rest and after provocative maneuvers. Patients with an outflow tract gradient of 30 mm Hg or more typically have systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve, with contact of either the anterior or (less commonly) the posterior mitral leaflet with the intraventricular septum during systole, in association with a posteriorly directed jet of mitral regurgitation, the severity of which is proportionate to the severity of the obstruction. Most patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have left atrial enlargement as well as echocardiographic evidence of diastolic dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging, although not needed for the diagnosis, readily demonstrates the characteristic abnormalities (E-Figs. 54-1 to 54-4).

E-FIGURE 54-1. Cardiac magnetic resonance image in a 40-year-old man with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Three-chamber cine in diastole(A) and systole(B). There is mid-cavity obliteration and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with complete systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve. The basal short axis cine(C) in diastole measures 30 mm, and there is mid-myocardial scar, visualized as late gadolinium enhancement(D).

E-FIGURE 54-2. A 70-year-old man with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Four-chamber cine in diastole(A) and systole(B). There is apical hypertrophy (16 mm) with 3 cm of apical cavity obliteration in systole. Note the papillary muscle insertion distally. Apical scar is present(C, D) without an overt apical aneurysm.

E-FIGURE 54-3. Cardiac magnetic resonance images in a 70-year-old man with an electrocardiographic abnormality, previous ventricular tachycardia (nonsustained), and recent ischemic stroke.

Cardiac magnetic resonance images (A, diastole;B, systole) show mid-cavity hypertrophy and obstruction with an apical aneurysm containing a filling defect, shown to be avascular on early gadolinium-enhanced imaging (C,arrow, thrombus), with extensive apical scar (D). This is apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with apical aneurysm formation.

E-FIGURE 54-4. A 50-year-old man with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a progressive (dilated) disease phase.

The left ventricular ejection fraction is 35% with probably restrictive physiology, although the patient is in atrial fibrillation. There is left ventricular dilation, particularly for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and severe atrial dilation (A, diastolic frame). The maximal wall thickness is known to have reduced during recent follow-up (C, was 23 mm, now 18 mm). There is extensive, non-ischemic myocardial scar estimated at 40% of the myocardium (B, D) and left atrial thrombus (arrow,B).

When it is available, cardiopulmonary exercise testing with metabolic gas exchange measurements provides an accurate and reproducible assessment of exercise capacity, which can be followed serially. Cardiac catheterization is rarely required for diagnosis or management, but it may be indicated when measurement of intracardiac pressures is required to guide therapeutic decisions (e.g., in patients with severe mitral regurgitation) and for the exclusion of coexistent coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain.

Diagnostic Criteria

A wall thickness of more than 2 standard deviations above the mean, corrected for age, gender, and height, is generally accepted as diagnostic. In adults, this value is typically 1.5 cm or more in men and 1.3 cm or more in women. In the presence of other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy, such as long-standing systemic hypertension or aortic stenosis, the diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may be problematic. However, secondary hypertrophy from other causes rarely exceeds 1.8 cm. Hypertrophy in the highly trained athlete is usually less than 1.6 cm in men and 1.4 cm in women and typically occurs in association with an increased left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and stroke volume. An ECG tracing showing Q waves or inferolateral repolarization changes in an athlete favors the diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Given the 50% probability of disease in first-degree relatives of a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, modified diagnostic criteria (Table 54-2) consider the high probability that their otherwise unexplained ECG and echocardiographic findings reflect incomplete disease expression, with the corresponding risks for complications and for passing the gene to their children.

Treatment

Clinical management is based mainly on symptoms (Fig. 54-3).4,5,5b Exceptions include specific therapies for lysosomal storage diseases, such as Pompe disease (Chapter 196) and Fabry disease (E-Fig. 54-5;Chapter 197), and for Friedreich ataxia (Chapter 393). The treatment of the remaining patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy focuses on the counseling of family members, the management of symptoms, lifestyle advice related to exercise,A1 and the prevention of disease-related complications.

E-FIGURE 54-5. A 38-year-old man with Fabry disease and cardiac involvement.

Cardiac magnetic resonance image shows a mild hypertrophy in the four-chamber (A) and short axis end-diastolic(C) views. The non–contrast-enhanced T1 map shows blue areas (T1 lowering) present circumferentially at the basal segments(B, D). This finding is in keeping with accumulation of glycosphingolipid in myocytes. This case does not have high T1 in the basal inferolateral wall (in many such patients, red signal indicating fibrosis on this color scale is seen here in an area matched by scar after contrast enhancement).

Family Evaluation

All patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy should be counseled on the implications of the diagnosis for their families. Careful pedigree analysis can reassure relatives who are not at risk for inheriting the disease. For those who are at risk, current guidelines recommend screening with a 12-lead electrocardiogram and echocardiogram at intervals of 12 to 18 months, usually starting at the age of 12 years (unless there is a “malignant” family history of premature sudden death, the child is symptomatic or a competitive athlete, or there is a clinical suspicion of left ventricular hypertrophy) until full growth and maturation are achieved (usually by the age of 18 to 21 years). Thereafter, if there are no signs of disease expression, screening approximately every 5 years is advised because the onset of left ventricular hypertrophy may be delayed until well into adulthood in some families. Modified diagnostic criteria (seeTable 54-2) consider the high probability that otherwise unexplained ECG and echocardiographic findings in first-degree relatives reflect incomplete disease expression.

When it is available, genetic testing can identify a disease-causing mutation in an index case and thereby provide presymptomatic diagnosis of family members. Whenever genetic testing is considered, individuals should be informed about the purpose of the test, the most probable mode of inheritance, and the potential hazards and limitations of genetic testing.

Symptom Management
Medical Therapy

Therapeutic options in patientswithout left ventricular outflow gradients are limited predominantly to pharmacologic therapy. β-Blockade may improve chest pain and dyspnea. The dose (starting at a dose equivalent to propranolol 120 mg/day) should be titrated to achieve a target heart rate of 50 to 70 beats per minute at rest and 130 to 140 beats per minute at peak exercise. Calcium antagonists such as verapamil (starting at a dose of 120 mg/day) and diltiazem (starting at a dose of 180 mg/day) are useful alternatives, particularly in patients with refractory chest pain, but high doses (e.g., verapamil >480 mg/day, diltiazem >360 mg/day) may be required. In patients with paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and no evidence of ventricular outflow obstruction, a transient mechanism such as myocardial ischemia or arrhythmia may be implicated, although investigations usually fail to identify the precise cause. Such patients as well as those with chronically raised pulmonary pressures may require diuretics (e.g., furosemide, 20 to 40 mg orally as needed, followed by 20 mg/day if required). The dose and duration of diuretic therapy should be minimized because injudicious use of these drugs can be dangerous, particularly in patients with severe diastolic impairment or labile obstruction.

In patients with symptoms caused by left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, the main aim of treatment is to reduce the outflow tract gradient. Traditional options include negative inotropic drugs, surgery, atrioventricular sequential pacing, and percutaneous alcohol ablation of the interventricular septum. Approximately 60 to 70% of patients improve with β-blockers, although high doses (equivalent to propranolol at 480 mg/day) are frequently required, and side effects are often limiting. When β-blockade alone is ineffective, disopyramide, titrated to the maximal tolerated dose (usually between 400 and 600 mg/day), may be effective in up to two thirds of patients, but side effects related to the anticholinergic effects (e.g., dry eyes and mouth, urinary retention) limit its use. Disopyramide should be given concomitantly with a small to mediumdose of a β-blocker (e.g., propranolol, 120 to 240 mg/day), which will slow the heart rate and also blunt rapid atrioventricular nodal conduction should supraventricular arrhythmias develop. In patients who have left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and are taking a β-blocker and disopyramide, other antiarrhythmic drugs that alter repolarization (e.g., sotalol or amiodarone) must be avoided because of the potential proarrhythmic effect. In patients with outflow tract gradients, verapamil can be effective, but caution is required in patients with severe obstruction or elevated pulmonary pressures.

A very promising new approach is mavacamten, which is a small molecule inhibitor of cardiac myosin. Mavacamten (at doses as low as 5 mg orally daily) can reduce obstruction and improve both exercise capacity and quality of life.A1b,A1c Preliminary data suggest a benefit in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as well.5c It is still undergoing further trials, with FDA review expected in early 2021.

Losartan (100 mg/day) is safe but has no benefit in terms of myocardial performance or progression of disease.A2 Similarly, ranolazine (1000 mg twice daily) is safe for reducing ventricular ectopy, but it does not change exercise performance, plasma prohormone brain natriuretic peptide levels, diastolic function, or quality of life.A3 An experimental small molecule inhibitor of sarcomere contractility can suppress hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in mice, but no such therapy is currently available in humans.

Interventional Therapy

Surgery should be considered for significant outflow obstruction (gradient >50 mm Hg) in patients who have symptoms refractory to medical therapy.6 The most commonly performed surgical procedure, ventricular septal myectomy, either abolishes or substantially reduces the gradient in 95% of cases, reduces mitral regurgitation, and improves exercise capacity and symptoms. Surgery should be performed in an experienced center, where mortality rates should be less than 1% for isolated myomectomy. The main complications (atrioventricular block, ventricular septal defects) are uncommon (2 to 5%). When concomitant procedures (e.g., mitral valve repair or replacement, coronary artery bypass grafting) are required or when other significant comorbidities are present, perioperative mortality rates are higher (4 to 5%).

In experienced centers, the selective injection of alcohol into a septal perforator branch of the left anterior descending coronary artery to create a localized septal scar yields outcomes similar to surgery. The main nonfatal complication is atrioventricular block requiring a pacemaker in 5 to 20% of patients.

Dual-chamber pacing with a short programmed atrial ventricular delay to produce maximal preexcitation while maintaining effective atrial transport can reduce the outflow gradient by 30 to 50% but provides little objective improvement in exercise capacity in most patients. Outcomes (gradient reduction, improved symptoms) are best in older patients with angulated septa and localized upper septal hypertrophy.

Supraventricular Arrhythmia

Atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is associated with a high risk for systemic embolization, so anticoagulation (international normalized ratio in the range of 2.0 to 3.0) should be considered in all patients with sustained or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (Chapter 58). Treatment with low-dose amiodarone, 1000 to 1400 mg/week, is effective in maintaining sinus rhythm and in controlling the ventricular response during breakthrough episodes. The addition of a low-dose β-blocker, verapamil, or diltiazem may be required for rate control. Serious side effects with low-dose amiodarone are uncommon. β-Blockers, particularly those with class III action (e.g., sotalol), are less effective alternatives. In general, the principles of managing atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are similar to those in other conditions (Chapter 58), with the provision that the threshold to use anticoagulation should be low because of the significant embolic risk.

Prevention of Sudden Death

The overall risk for sudden death in children and adults with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is approximately 0.5 to 1% per year, but a minority of individuals have a much greater risk for ventricular arrhythmia and sudden death. The most powerful predictor of sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a history of previous cardiac arrest. In patients without such a history, the most useful markers of risk are a family history of premature (<40 years of age) sudden cardiac death, unexplained syncope (unrelated to neurocardiogenic mechanisms), flat or hypotensive blood pressure response to upright exercise, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on ambulatory ECG monitoring or during exercise, and severe left ventricular hypertrophy on echocardiography (defined as a maximal left ventricular wall thickness of 30 mm or more). A clinical risk prediction model for sudden death (available online at//www.hcmrisk.org/) can estimate an individual patient’s absolute 5-year risk of sudden death. Patients with an annual mortality rate of 4 to 6% based on the online risk predictor or on the presence of two or more of these markers should be considered for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (Chapter 60). All patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy should be advised to avoid competitive sports and intense physical exertion. Patients without any risk factors do not warrant an ICD. For patients with one risk factor, decisions about an ICD should be individualized on the basis of the patient’s age and severity of disease and level of risk that is acceptable to the patient.

Prognosis

Most patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy follow a stable and benign course with a low risk for adverse events and a survival similar to that of age- and gender-matched normal populations, but many experience progressive symptoms caused by atrial arrhythmia and gradual deterioration in left ventricular systolic and diastolic function. With modern therapy, the mortality rate related specifically to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is 0.53% per year, with 5- and 10-year cardiomyopathy-related survival rates of 98% and 94%, respectively.7 The annual incidence of stroke varies from 0.56 to 0.8% per year, rising to 1.9% in patients older than 60 years, and 23% of strokes are fatal. The development of severe systolic heart failure is associated with a poor prognosis, with an overall mortality rate of up to 11% per year. The incidence of infective endocarditis is 1.4 per 1000 person-years overall but 3.8 per 1000 person-years in patients with obstruction.

Cardiomyopathies

ByJOSÉ MARÍN-GARCÍA M.D., in Post-Genomic Cardiology, 2007

OVERVIEW

Cardiomyopathies, diseases of heart muscle, may result from an array of factors that damage the heart and other organs and impair myocardial function, including infections, toxins, and cardiac ischemia. Over the past decade, the significance of inherited gene defects in the pathogenesis of primary cardiomyopathies has been recognized, with numerous mutations identified as etiological factors in the more prevalent types of cardiomyopathy (i.e., hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [HCM] and dilated cardiomyopathy [DCM]) and more recently in more uncommon phenotypes such as restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/ARVC). Moreover, genetic defects are increasingly implicated in the pathogenesis of metabolic cardiomyopathies (often associated with extracardiac presentations), including the mitochondrial cardiomyopathies and the cardiomyopathy associated with diabetes. These genetic defects involve numerous intracellular pathways sharing a number of critical features, as well as displaying distinct elements, in fostering the various cardiomyopathic phenotypes, including those arising in sporadic and acquired cardiomyopathies resulting from infection (e.g., viral-induced), toxins (e.g., alcohol), and ischemic insult. The primary pathophysiological mechanisms implicated in cardiomyopathy include defective force generation caused by mutations in sarcomeric protein genes; defective force transmission caused by mutations in cytoskeletal protein genes; myocardial energy deficits caused by mutations in both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA encoded genes; and abnormal Ca++ homeostasis caused by altered availability of Ca++ and altered myofibrillar Ca++ sensitivity.

A leading premise of ongoing research on cardiomyopathy is defining the role(s) of a plurality of genes in cardiac function and explaining the mechanisms by which mutations in these genes lead to hypertrophy, dilation, and contractile failure and, hopefully, to discover successful therapeutic strategies.

Read full chapter

URL: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123736987500139

Cardiovascular Abnormalities in HIV-Infected Individuals

Douglas P. Zipes MD, in Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 2019

Cardiomyopathy and Left Ventricular Abnormalities

The incidence of HIV-associated cardiomyopathy has decreased dramatically from the pre-ART era, from 25.6 cases per 1000 person-years to 3.9 cases, according to one review (seeChapter 79).80 Additionally, in the pre-ART era, HIV-associated cardiomyopathy was defined as symptomatic, systolic dysfunction with left ventricular dilation, and was seen almost exclusively in patients with advanced HIV disease and AIDS; in the post-ART era, the diagnosis often refers to systolic or diastolic dysfunction detected by echocardiography in asymptomatic HIV patients.

The pathophysiology of HIV-associated cardiomyopathy is likely multifactorial, with proposed causes including direct HIV infection of the myocardium with or without myocarditis, coinfection with other viruses such as coxsackievirus B3 and cytomegalovirus, toxicity from ART, autoimmune factors, opportunistic infections, and nutritional disorders. When HIV-associated cardiomyopathy consisted of severe, dilated cardiomyopathy, the cause was believed to be opportunistic infections or myocarditis. Now that the disease has changed to more nuanced myocardial dysfunction, the understanding of mechanisms has become more nuanced as well.

Infection of the heart with the HIV virus is thought to cause impaired systolic function. HIV gene products, such as tat (transactivator of transcription, can also contribute. Proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor have also been shown to depress systolic function.80 Some types of ART cause mitochondrial toxicity, which may impair ventricular function. In sub-Saharan Africa and other poor areas, nutritional deficiencies may contribute to HIV-associated cardiomyopathy. HIV-associated heart failure has been reported in low- and middle-income countries.81 Most studies of HIV patients have been performed in developed countries with readily available access to ART, so a different spectrum of CV diseases may be observed in developing countries.

Left ventricular hypertrophy is more common in HIV-infected patients than in controls). In one study, HIV-infected participants had a left ventricular mass index that was 8 g/m2 (the mean) larger than the mass index in controls (P = 0.001).82 The higher left ventricular mass index was independently associated with a lower nadir CD4 T-cell count, suggesting that immunodeficiency may play a role in this process. After adjustment for age and traditional risk factors, HIV patients were 2.4 times more likely to have diastolic dysfunction than controls. Another study compared left ventricular mass in patients with and without HIV infection and with and without hypertension.83 In both hypertensive and normotensive persons, HIV patients had a greater left ventricular mass and more diastolic dysfunction than uninfected controls.

Cardiomyopathies

Kent H. Rehfeldt, ... William C. OliverJr., in Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography, 2014

Cardiomyopathy

Cardiomyopathy is any structural and functional abnormality of the heart muscle unattributable to specific causes or disease processes such as coronary artery disease (CAD), congenital heart disease, or valvular disease. Over the years, classification of this condition has been updated by the rapid advancement of genetic, imaging, and clinical investigation. In 2006 in association with the American Heart Association (AHA), the classification of heart muscle disease was updated with an intention to bridge the gap between rapidly expanding genetic knowledge and existing clinical experience. An expert panel proposed this definition:

Cardiomyopathies are a heterogeneous group of diseases of the myocardium associated with mechanical and/or electrical dysfunction that usually (but not invariably) exhibit inappropriate ventricular hypertrophy or dilatation and are due to a variety of causes that frequently are genetic. Cardiomyopathies either are confined to the heart or are part of generalized systemic disorders, often leading to cardiovascular death or progressive heart failure–related disability.1

This new classification divided cardiomyopathies into two major groups—primary and secondary—based on the predominant organ involvement. It retained the common clinical cardiomyopathies synonymous with worsening myocardial performance due to diastolic or systolic dysfunction, but for the first time included diseases with electrical abnormalities that cause life-threatening arrhythmias (differentiated by their specific molecular nature). Primary cardiomyopathies include those conditions with only or mostly myocardial involvement (genetic, mixed, acquired) (Fig. 18-1). This places a traditional cardiomyopathy like hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with disorders that cause tachyarrhythmias because of genomic changes that encode for ion channel dysfunction.1 Secondary cardiomyopathies are defined as the result of any disease process that includes the heart but is not limited to the heart. These were previously referred to as specific cardiomyopathies or specific heart muscle diseases. Box 18-1 lists some of the major disease processes that may be associated with cardiomyopathy but are not considered “primary” cardiomyopathies under the new classification. Also excluded are cardiomyopathies due to myocardial conditions such as valvular, congenital heart, and atherosclerotic disease. The common use of “ischemic cardiomyopathy” is excluded.

The importance of echocardiography in cardiomyopathy diagnosis, research, and patient care is evident. Using the AHA classification of cardiomyopathies, this chapter will first provide an overview of primary cardiomyopathy in the adult in association with a range of echocardiographic imaging, including during the perioperative period. This patient population may need a wide range of cardiac surgical procedures (including heart transplantation) that will necessitate perioperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). TEE may be especially valuable for optimal care in this patient population during noncardiac surgical procedures, such as cholecystectomy or hip replacement.

Enormous work has been done identifying genetic causes for cardiomyopathies. Genetic testing is advancing rapidly to identify disease-causing mutations in family members at risk but asymptomatic.2 The primary cardiomyopathies have a very complex genetic profile, with mutations that affect clinical expression of the same disease. The result is heightened clinical surveillance and possibly earlier intervention and prevention of the sequelae of cardiomyopathies. At this time, genetic testing is not 100% sensitive, so it is usually performed once the disease has been diagnosed and confirmed clinically. Genetic screening’s greatest use is to identify carriers within a family. This may allow family members that carry the same genetic mutation to be followed, since they may have a reduced penetrance that leads to a lesser form of the disease or even asymptomatic expression.3

Most inherited cardiomyopathies demonstrate a mendelian autosomal dominant inheritance. It has been accepted that HCM is largely a genetic defect of the contractile proteins. In contrast, the genetic trail of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is really only solid as it pertains to familial DCM. The more common sporadic DCM has not been found to have a genetic basis. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) is primarily related to genetic mutations that encode proteins of the desmosome. Desmosomes, cell-cell adhesion organelles, are especially abundant in heart tissue.4 A genetic basis for restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) has not been identified, but a familial form exists and is caused by mutations in the troponin I gene.5 The genetic basis for left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) has not been found (and the diagnostic criteria for LVNC continue to be debated),6 but it is frequently familial, with at least 25% of asymptomatic relatives having a range of echocardiographic abnormalities.5 More extensive information about the genetics of primary cardiomyopathies is available.7-10

Read full chapter

URL: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781455707614000189

Cardiomyopathies

G. d'Amati, C. Giordano, in Cardiovascular Pathology (Fourth Edition), 2016

Etiology

Cardiomyopathies with a hypertrophic phenotype have in common the genetic etiology. However, the pathways leading to the phenotypic expression and the clinical and morphologic features vary widely, according to the gene (or class of genes) involved. Increased ventricular thickness is a common finding of sarcomeric HCM, mitochondrial disorders, metabolic or storage disease, familial transthyretin-related amyloidosis, Friedreich' ataxia, and Noonan/LEOPARD syndrome. Clues in the differential diagnosis include the pattern of inheritance, age of onset, and clinical presentation (syndromic vs. nonsyndromic disease), pattern of hypertrophy (symmetric vs. nonsymmetric), electrocardiographic abnormalities, laboratory tests, and histopathologic findings. These allow the identification of “red flags” that can guide the genetic analysis for identification of specific subsets of cardiomyopathies [5].

Read full chapter

URL: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124202191000112

Cardiomyopathies

Stephanie S.F. Fischer, B. Craig Weldon, in Complications in Anesthesia (Second Edition), 2007

Definition

The World Health Organization defines cardiomyopathies (CMs) as myocardial diseases associated with cardiac dysfunction. They are classified by the dominant pathophysiology or, if known, by causative factors. Thus, CM may be dilated, hypertrophic, restrictive, or a special type called arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (or arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia). If the cause of a CM is known (i.e., secondary CM), it may be ischemic, valvular, hypertensive, inflammatory, metabolic, or peripartum in origin. CMs can also be associated with systemic disease, neuromuscular disorders, or exposure to toxins.

Read full chapter

URL: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978141602215250171X

Cardiomyopathies

Juan Pablo Kaski, Perry Elliott, in Paediatric Cardiology (Third Edition), 2010

ANNOTATED REFERENCES

Elliott P, Andersson B, Arbustini E, et al: Classification of the cardiomyopathies: A position statement from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J 2008;29:270–276.

This recent report from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases provides a comprehensive classification of the cardiomyopathies.

Nugent AW, Daubeney PE, Chondros P, et al: The epidemiology of childhood cardiomyopathy in Australia. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1639–1646.

Lipshultz SE, Sleeper LA, Towbin JA, et al: The incidence of pediatric cardiomyopathy in two regions of the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1647–1655.

These two population-based studies provide novel epidemiological and aetiological data on childhood cardiomyopathies.

Ahmad F, Seidman JG, Seidman CE: The genetic basis for cardiac remodeling. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2005;6:185–216.

This is an excellent and comprehensive review of the genetic basis of cardiomyopathies.

Elliott PM, Poloniecki J, Dickie S, et al: Sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Identification of high risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:2212–2218.

This study reports a non-invasive risk stratification algorithm for identifying patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at risk of sudden death. Although the data is derived from adults, it has been extrapolated to children with some success.

Maron BJ, Shen WK, Link MS, et al: Efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for the prevention of sudden death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2000;342:365–373.

This large study demonstrates that implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators prevents sudden death in a population of patients, mostly adults, with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Mason JW, O’Connell JB, Herskowitz A, et al: A clinical trial of immunosuppressive therapy for myocarditis. The Myocarditis Treatment Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1995;333:269–275.

This randomised controlled trial of 111 adults with myocarditis showed no improvement in survival in patients given immunosuppressive therapy, suggesting that the routine use of immunosuppressive drugs in patients with myocarditis is not warranted.

Rosenthal D, Chrisant MR, Edens E, et al: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Practice guidelines for management of heart failure in children. J Heart Lung Transplant 2004;23:1313–1333.

These practical guidelines for the management of cardiac failure in children provide an excellent and comprehensive review of the evidence for different drugs available for therapeutic use in children and adults.

Towbin JA, Lowe AM, Colan SD, et al: Incidence, causes, and outcomes of dilated cardiomyopathy in children. JAMA 2006;296:1867–1876.

This population-based report provides data on the epidemiology, aetiology, and outcome of children with dilated cardiomyopathy in the current era.

Shaddy RE, Boucek MM, Hsu DT, et al: Carvedilol for children and adolescents with heart failure: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007;298:1171–1179.

This is the first randomised controlled trial of medication for the management of cardiac failure in children. Although not statistically significant, the results suggested a trend towards improved survival when patients were treated with carvedilol.

Read full chapter

URL: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780702030642000527

Cardiomyopathies

Matthias G. Friedrich, in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Second Edition), 2010

Metabolism

CMR allows the semiquantitative assessment of several nuclei, and numerous studies have been published on 1H and 31P CMR spectroscopy (CMRS) in cardiomyopathies. Changes of high-energy phosphates as studied by 31P CMRS in cardiomyopathies have been reported for DCM31–33 and HCM.34,35 However, CMRS is still an experimental approach. Whereas 1H CMRS is characterized by a strong signal from water-bound protons and difficulties of spectral interpretation, 31P CMRS is limited by the weakness of the phosphorus signal. Thus, voxels have to be too large to cover circumscribed myocardial regions, and spectra are often altered by blood or adjacent tissue (e.g., skeletal muscle). Furthermore, CMRS requires extensive experience of the investigator, strong physicist support, and sophisticated hardware and software. Therefore, the number of centers with access to this promising tool is currently limited.

Read full chapter

URL: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780443066863000382

Which heart muscle disease is unrelated to other cardiovascular disease?

These two categories are: Ischemic cardiomyopathy, caused by heart attacks or coronary artery disease (CAD). Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, types unrelated to CAD.

What are the 4 cardiovascular diseases?

There are four main types of CVD:.
coronary heart disease..
stroke..
peripheral arterial disease..
aortic disease..

What are 3 common cardiovascular diseases?

They include:.
coronary heart disease – a disease of the blood vessels supplying the heart muscle;.
cerebrovascular disease – a disease of the blood vessels supplying the brain;.
peripheral arterial disease – a disease of blood vessels supplying the arms and legs;.

What is disease of the heart muscle?

Cardiomyopathy (kahr-dee-o-my-OP-uh-thee) is a disease of the heart muscle that makes it harder for the heart to pump blood to the rest of the body. Cardiomyopathy can lead to heart failure.

Toplist

Neuester Beitrag

Stichworte