This is a preview. Log in to get access
Abstract
Organizational culture encompasses both individual and group-level phenomena. However, to date, the individual-level dynamics of organizational culture have remained relatively neglected. This paper addresses this neglect by focusing on culture's manifestation in individuals' sensemaking structures and processes. Building off the social cognition literature, I propose that organizational culture's influence on individual sensemaking is revealed in the operation of a patterned system of organization-specific schemas. Schemas refer to the cognitive structures in which an individual's knowledge is retained and organized. In addition to being knowledge repositories, schemas also direct information acquisition and processing. They guide answering the questions central to sensemaking efforts: "What or who is it?," "What are its implications; what does it mean?," and "How should I respond?" After a brief review of schema theory, the categories of schema knowledge relevant to understanding sensemaking in organizations and the cultural influences on their emergence are examined. The conscious and unconscious operation of these schemas in the actual process of making sense of organizational stimuli is framed within a schema-directed, intrapsychic, mental dialogue perspective on social cognition. Specifically, I propose that in the social setting of organizations, individuals make sense out of their experiences based in large part on the outcomes of contrived mental dialogues between themselves (e.g., "I think it means this and I would be inclined toward this response") and other contextually-relevant (past or present; real or imagined) individuals or groups (e.g., "What would my boss and peers think about this? What would they want me to do?"). The content of the argument provided for others is guided by the individual's schemas for those others. I close the paper by discussing the ways in which this schema-based perspective enhances our understanding of the individual experiences of cultural sharing, subcultural boundaries, and psychological attachment.
Journal Information
This unique journal scans the globe for new research that draws upon multiple disciplines or levels of analysis: achieves genuine integration of theory, data, and managment applications; and improves organizational functioning. Artificial Intelligence Communications Theory Economics History Hypercompetition Information Science Organization theory Political Science Psychology Strategic Management Systems Theory
Publisher Information
With over 12,500 members from around the globe, INFORMS is the leading international association for professionals in operations research and analytics. INFORMS promotes best practices and advances in operations research, management science, and analytics to improve operational processes, decision-making, and outcomes through an array of highly-cited publications, conferences, competitions, networking communities, and professional development services.
Rights & Usage
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Organization Science © 1994 INFORMS
Request Permissions
Related Questions
Q29:
Kegan and Lahey wrote about a language shift, for example, from the language of rules and policies to the language of ______. A) commitment B) personal responsibility C) ongoing regard D) public agreement
Q30:
The complex adaptive systems perspective ______ the notion of the organization as a machinelike set of interconnected and systematized parts that form a predictable whole. A) accepts B) believes C) rejects D) asserts
Q31:
Which of the boxes within Weisbord's model includes formal goal clarity and informal goal agreement? A) Purposes B) Structure C) Rewards D) Relationships
Q32:
In which type of environment would clients be more drawn to systems theory approaches? A) rapidly changing B) uncertain C) evolving D) structured
Q33:
Creating change within the social construction perspective means A) rigidly following the same set of rules through a well-defined process. B) being inventive and creative with how change is achieved, negotiating among stakeholders to produce dialogues. C) following a traditional model from inputs through processes to outputs. D) expressing discontent with current practices in an effort to pressure change.
Q35:
Which level of social construction conversation deals with the cognitive frames and schema? A) intrapersonal B) personal C) interpersonal and small group D) organizational
Q36:
In which type of environment would a practitioner find it enlightening to examine a team's language during meetings to better understand how the team is arriving at decisions? A) stable B) structured C) uncertain D) hierarchical
Q37:
Which approach or new paradigm resonates with observers because it highlights how changes can adapt and spread throughout a system to illustrate how even small changes made to a single project team can have expansive effects across the organization? A) complex adaptive systems perspective B) dialogic approach C) systems theory D) social construction approach
Q38:
Which of the following is NOT a reason a practitioner may have regarding which model to emphasize? A) If the model is right B) If the model facilitates additional understanding C) If the model is consistent with the practitioner's approach D) If the model meets the client's needs
Q39:
Kegan and Lahey wrote about a language shift, for example, from the language of complaint to the language of ______. A) commitment B) personal responsibility C) competing commitments D) ongoing regard