A nurse is assessing a client who is 2 days postoperative following a total prostatectomy

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014 Mar-Apr; 22(2): 337–345.

Abstract

Objective

to assess and summarize the best scientific evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials about telephone follow-up of patients after radical prostatectomy, based on information about how the phone calls are made and the clinical and psychological effects for the individuals who received this intervention.

Method

the search was undertaken in the electronic databases Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cinahl, Lilacs and Cochrane. Among the 368 references found, five were selected.

Results

two studies tested interventions focused on psychological support and three tested interventions focused on the physical effects of treatment. The psychoeducative intervention to manage the uncertainty about the disease and the treatment revealed statistically significant evidences and reduced the level of uncertainty and anguish it causes.

Conclusion

the beneficial effects of telephone follow-up could be determined, as a useful tool for the monitoring of post-prostatectomy patients.

Keywords: Prostatectomy, Health Education, Telephone, Patient Discharge

Introduction

The education of postoperative patients is fundamental to provide appropriate knowledge to individuals with a view to self-care at home and, thus, to reduce the occurrence of complications after the discharge and to improve their recovery and quality of life(1).

The educative interventions related to the patients' preparation for hospital discharge should be based on the following priorities: increase of individual knowledge about self-care and promotion of behavioral change to stimulate self-care(1).

The diagnosis of prostate cancer can result in anguish and stress for the patient, mainly regarding the uncertainty about the treatment and recovery(2-3). Radical prostatectomy is the most used procedure among the different treatments for this type of cancer, but can cause changes in patients' quality of life, as they may suffer from urinary incontinence and sexual impotence, among other symptoms, deriving from the surgical procedure(3-4).

Education and counseling are regular and fundamental items for care delivery to men submitted to this type of surgery, in the pre as well as in the postoperative phase. These items should be focused on providing the best information on the patients' preparation for surgical wound care and indwelling urinary catheter maintenance at home, as well as on coping with physical side effects, such as urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction, and the consequent psychological suffering these effects cause for the men and their wives(3-5).

The shorter hospital stay results in few opportunities to advise the patients and answer their concerns(3,6-7). In addition, most of the complications happen at home(1). Hence, post-discharge follow-up is essential for patients and their relatives to be prepared for self-care and lifestyle changes. Another benefit is the bonding between the health team and the patients, which can further the professionals' confidence and the feeling of safety in view of concerns and doubts(2,8).

Written information, a list of teaching items offered at the hospital to guarantee the consistency of patient teaching, the partner's involvement in teaching sessions and telephone follow-up after discharge from hospital have been identified as important strategies for the development of educative programs(9), also for discharge(1).

Interventions related to postoperative education after radical prostatectomy, including telephone follow-up, can enhance the patients' physical recovery, emotional wellbeing and adherence to self-care after discharge from hospital, considering that patients will feel safer if they know what they are going to face and what to do to minimize the effects(3). The telephone follow-up and education strategy adopted by health professionals offers valuable support for patients and permits reinforcing discharge orientations, symptom management, information exchange, early identification of signs of complications, besides the clarification of doubts and concerns. The main objective of this kind of intervention is to further adherence to post-discharge care and to facilitate the transition between the hospital and the return home. This reduces the stress and increases the patients' knowledge to cope with the symptoms, resulting in increased confidence in the patient-professional relationship and in the quality of services after discharge from hospital(7-8).

The telephone follow-up method has been used mainly as a form of monitoring for those patients submitted to surgical procedures, who are not characterized as high-risk patients, allowing them to lead a life as normal as possible and distanced from the hospital environment. This care strategy is considered better for the service, by reducing the workload in the conventional outpatient monitoring system, allowing the professionals to focus on care for the patients who actually need hospital care(6,10), which consequently also reduces the spending on possible readmissions(10-11).

Telephone follow-up involves a range of aspects, such as the frequency, duration and time of discharge when the call starts, the professional making the call, the objective of the telephone contacts, the format and content addressed(7-8).

In view of these considerations, it was considered pertinent to assess and summarize the best scientific evidence about the telephone follow-up of patients after radical prostatectomy and to obtain information about how the phone calls are made and the clinical and psychological effects for the individuals who received this intervention.

Methods

A systematic literature review was undertaken, which is aimed at joining all evidences available, in accordance with pre-specified eligibility criteria, in order to answer a specific research question. A systematic method is used, providing more reliable results based on which conclusions can be drawn and decisions made(12).

Based on the Cochrane review method, the steps followed in this systematic review were: definition of the research question and inclusion criteria, search and selection of the studies, data collection, assessment of methodological quality of the studies included, data analysis, identification of bias, summarization and presentation of results in tables, interpretation of the results and presentation of the conclusions(12).

Thus, the guiding question to achieve the proposed objective was: "What are the effects of telephone use on patient follow-up after prostatectomy?".

The inclusion criteria for the articles were: clinical trials (including controlled and non-controlled studies and randomized controlled clinical trials)(13), published in English, Portuguese or Spanish, involving patients submitted to radical prostatectomy and that used phone calls as the intervention for post-discharge follow-up. The publication time of the search was not limited because of the specific study design, thus increasing its scientific evidence strength.

The search was undertaken in six electronic databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System on-line (Medline), Web of Science, Excerpta Médica (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) and the Cochrane Library's Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

The controlled descriptors from the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) MeSH vocabulary were used: "prostatectomy", "telenursing", "telephone" and "hotlines". The Boolean operator AND was used for restrictive combinations between the descriptor "prostatectomy" and the others. Based on the references of the selected articles, a manual search was undertaken of articles that were not found in the databases.

Using the above descriptors, 368 papers were found. Nevertheless, 363 of these were excluded: different theme (179); repeated (143); telephone for data collection (30); different study design - four descriptive, two qualitative and one narrative review (7); editorial (1); research protocol (1); language - Japanese (1); telephone follow-up in men with prostate cancer without specifying the treatment (1). It is highlighted that, based on the article search strategy through the references of the selected articles, no clinical trial was found. Table 1 describes the reasons for excluding the articles and their respective databases.

Table 1

Selection of publications from databases according to the exclusion criteria. Brazil, 2013

To extract the data, an instrument was used based on the Cochrane Manual of Systematic Intervention Reviews, which identifies the following data: title, journal, database, publication year, place of data collection, objective, methodological details, interventions, outcome measures and statistical analysis, results, implications for practice, evidence level and Jadad score(14).

The Jadad score assesses the methodological quality of the study(14). One point is attributed to each positive answer in case the study is described as randomized, double-blind and the exclusions and sample losses are described. In addition, another point is attributed to each item if the randomization and blinding are appropriate. If considered inappropriate, however, one point is subtracted from each item. The total score can range between zero and five. Scores equal or superior to three reveal studies of appropriate methodological quality.

Results

Among the five papers selected, one was found in PubMed(15); one in CINAHL(16); and three in the Web of Knowledge(17-19). The journals where the studies were published are: Urologic Nursing(16); Urology(15); Cancer(18-19); and International Journal of Urological Nursing(17). Figure 1 describes all studies in detail, considering the objective, sample, data about the telephone intervention, results and implications.

Figure 1

Characteristics of clinical trials included in the systematic review regarding telephone follow-up after radical prostatectomy

In the assessment of the studies through the Jadad scale, three(15,17-18) obtained score three, as they were randomized, satisfactorily described the randomization process and reported on sample losses; two(16,19) received score two, as they did not describe the randomization form. It is highlighted that none of the five studies was double blind.

Two papers(18-19) tested psychological support interventions through telephone follow-up. One tested the management of uncertainty deriving from lack of knowledge and concerns, directly involving the patient and expanded to a relative(18), and the other skills training for coping with the adverse effects of treatment(19).

The other studies(15-17) tested interventions focused on the physical effects of treatment, such as pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence(15) and the reinforcement of information received upon discharge for home care management(16-17).

Content of phone calls

In two studies(18-19), the calls contained information on prostate cancer, treatment symptoms, symptom management methods and skills teaching for better communication. One of them(19) also taught relaxation techniques and formulated a plan to cope with the disease and treatment.

Other contents addressed were pelvic floor muscle training associated with information about urinary catheter management, urinary tract infection prevention, medication, erectile dysfunction, emotional recovery and counseling(15).

Some authors described the use of a protocol for telephone follow-up, with questions about home care management and doubts or concerns(16-17).

Responsible professionals and duration of the calls

The telephone calls focused on the physical effects were made by urologic nurses(15-17). In two studies, one call was made three to five days after the discharge, which took between 10 and 15 minutes(16-17); in another study, the calls started four weeks after the surgery, with a mean duration of 15 minutes and weekly frequency during the first three months and then monthly for one year, totaling 21 calls(15).

The telephone interventions related to psychological factors were made by trained nurses(18) and psychologists(19) and happened weekly, totaling six to eight calls. The duration of the calls was mentioned in only one study(19), in which psychologists performed the intervention during one hour. It is highlighted that none of the authors mentioned the initial period of the interventions.

Outcomes measured

The outcomes measured were urinary incontinence(15); quality of life(15,19); concerns/uncertainties(16,18); control of adverse effects of treatment(18); self-efficacy(19); home care management(16); use of medical resources during postoperative period(16); satisfaction(16-17); confidence regarding home care(17) and rehabilitation related to urinary catheter maintenance, wound treatment, pain, intestinal function and activities of daily living(17).

To assess the urinary incontinence, the 24 Hour Pad and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) were used(15). The results were not significant between the groups and it was detected that the first four months are the main incontinence period.

To assess the uncertainty/concerns, the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale and the Self-Control Scale were used, with its subscales "cognitive reformulation" and "problem solving", associated with a semistructured interview(18), besides self-reporting(16). Uncertainty declined significantly (P=0.01), with differences between the cognitive reformulation (P=0.005) and problem solving groups (P=0.009), mainly during the first four months (P=0.05)(18). The related concerns were the side effects of the treatment, such as incontinence and erection problems(18); besides bladder spasms, scrotal swelling, pain, constipation, physical exercise level(16) and communication with the professional(18) (Figure 1).

The quality of life was assessed through the International Prostate Symptom Score - IPSS(15), Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite - EPIC (with its domains about urinary function, intestinal function, hormonal function, among others) and the Physical Function and Mental Health Scales of the Short Form-36 Health Survey SF-36(19). No significant differences were found between the groups in the studies under analysis although, after one year, urinary incontinence did no longer interfere in the quality of life (P=0.001)(15) and the intestinal function demonstrated a significant effect, resulting from a decline in the discomfort resulting from treatment (P=0.042)(19).

The Symptom Distress Scale was used to assess the control of adverse treatment effects(15). According to specific items about prostate cancer, men from the intervention group demonstrated a better urinary flow control (P=0.03), mainly during the first four months of the study (P=0.01) (Figure 1).

The use of medical resources in the postoperative period(16) was verified based on self-reporting. Sixty percent of the men from the control groups used unplanned resources, such as medical visits, against 47% in the intervention group, four of whom (28.5%) used the resources before receiving the intervention. As regards the rehabilitation(17), the reductions were clinically relevant in the domains pain control (23%), urinary catheter management (18%) and wound treatment (13%).

Discussion

The treatment of cancer and its side effects imply uncertainties and psychological suffering for the patients. Interventions aimed at reducing these effects are valid to improve the patients' quality of life. A study in the United States that involved patients submitted to stem cell transplantation verified the effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral therapy by telephone, offered by psychologists, and found a reduction in the post-traumatic stress caused by the procedure and its consequent anguish and depression(20). Significant improvements were also observed in a sample study, permitting reductions in the uncertainty and, consequently, in the anguish caused by radical prostatectomy (P= 0.01)(18).

As regards the physical complications, urinary incontinence is the most frequent and affects the patient's self-esteem, favoring the occurrence of dermatitis and constant urinary infections(5). To correct this alteration, different types of treatment exist, classified as conservative or invasive. The most common form of conservative treatment is pelvic floor muscle training, which involves repeated and progressive muscle contractions to strengthen the pelvic floor and consequently improve the bladder function. Evidence shows that patients participating in sessions of this treatment revert this picture faster when compared to patients who do not receive any kind of intervention(21).

No consensus exists in the literature about the initial period of the training or how many exercises or sessions are needed. No reports exist either about the benefit of telephone follow-up in addition to this intervention. One of the studies in the sample used telephone follow-up in combination to a single pelvic floor muscle training session, which took place four weeks after the radical prostatectomy(15) and found that this combination was as effective as training directly with the patient, besides entailing lower costs and enhancing the solution of patients' doubts.

One relevant point indicated in one of the studies(15) was the most critical period for urinary incontinence, that is, the first four months after the surgery. This finding was reaffirmed in other papers in the sample, considering this period as the most relevant for a psychoeducative intervention(18).

Urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction deriving from the surgery also have a negative influence on the marital relation and on the couple's quality of life, entailing psychic suffering, fatigue and changes in social and sexual life, demanding interventions that minimize these effects(5).

With this goal, one study in the sample tested coping skills related to the disease in patients and their wives(19), showing that, even without significant differences between the groups, depression and fatigue improved in the women who received the intervention, enhancing the couple's energy. American researchers support this findings after verifying that an intervention by nurses through visits and telephone calls, using a standardized protocol, achieved a modest improvement in the sexual function and in the couple's marital relationship, although without statistical significance(3).

Another important question addressed in the sample studies is the relation between telephone follow-up and a reduction in the search for health resources(16). Although no significant results were found, the patients in the intervention group used fewer resources in the postoperative period, reducing the number of readmissions and, consequently, causing resource savings for the health sector. At a hospital in the United States, after testing telephone follow-up with its patients, mainly those submitted to cardiac surgeries, a decrease was found in readmissions and an increase in the satisfaction of its clients(11).

Reinforcing the orientations provided during hospital discharge is also possible by telephone, facilitating the transition process from discharge to home care. Chinese researchers verified the feasibility of telephone follow-up by nurse experts in care delivery to post-intestinal stoma patients(22). Besides reinforcing the information granted in the discharge period, this was a proper moment for problem solving, such as the correction of inappropriate stoma management. One of the studies in the sample also reaffirms this feasibility and identified that post-prostatectomy patients, despite receiving oral and written information upon discharge, forget about the orientations and experience other concerns at home that wre not clarified during the hospitalization(16).

Final considerations

After analyzing the five studies in the sample, telephone use can be summarized as a strategy for post-discharge follow-up with a view to assessing the patient's knowledge, discussing the concerns and offering help to cope with them, monitoring physical and psychological symptoms, as well as encouraging behavioral and lifestyle changes.

Only the study that tested a psychoeducative intervention to manage the uncertainty related to the disease and treatment offered statistically significant evidence about post-prostatectomy telephone follow-up, with a significant reduction in the level of uncertainty and anguish it produced.

Nevertheless, it could be identified that, in comparison with the advances in the control group, the use of telephone follow-up for patients after prostatectomy also reduced the demand for health services, helped to control adverse effects like urinary incontinence, reinforced information provided during discharge, solved doubts resulting from the home care experience, reduced physical alterations like anxiety and depression in patients and their wives and taught skills to manage the sexual dysfunction.

The range of interventions and the different outcomes measures in the sample studies made it impossible to statistically analyze the results found. This diversity also made it difficult to infer about the best time, quantity and frequency of the phone calls.

Nevertheless, this study was considered important to determine the beneficial effects of telephone follow-up in this surgical modality. Due to the reduced hospitalization period, the time available to provide information for discharge has been short and, hence, telephone follow-up turns into a useful tool for nurses and other professionals to act in this transition period, with a view to enhancing the health-related quality of life of patients and their relatives.

Funding Statement

Paper extracted from doctoral dissertation "Effectiveness of an education program for home care of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: randomized clinical trial" presented to Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. Supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), process # 141377/2010-0

Footnotes

1Paper extracted from doctoral dissertation "Effectiveness of an education program for home care of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: randomized clinical trial" presented to Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. Supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), process # 141377/2010-0

References

1. Fredericks S, Guruge S, Sidani S, Wan T. Postoperative Patient Education: A Systematic Review. [Revisão] [acesso 10 nov 2012];Clin Nurs Res. 2010 19(2):144–164. Disponível em: //cnr.sagepub.com/content/19/2/144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. D Lambert S, Girgis A, Turner J, McElduff P, Kayser K, Vallentine P. A pilot randomized controlled trial of the feasibility of a self-directed coping skills intervention for couples facing prostate cancer: Rationale and design. [acesso 5 jan 2013];Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 10:119–119. Disponível em: //www.hqlo.com/content/10/1/119. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. McCorkle R, Siefert ML, Dowd MF, Rohinson JP, Pickett M. Effects of Advanced Practice Nursing on Patient and Spouse Depressive Symptoms, Sexual Function, and Marital Interaction after Radical Prostatectomy. Urol Nurs. 2007;27(1):65–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Chambers SK, Schover L, Halford K, Clutton S, Ferguson M, Gordon L, et al. ProsCan for Couples: Randomised controlled trial of a couples based sexuality intervention for men with localized prostate cancer who receive radical prostatectomy. [acesso 25 nov 2012];BMC Cancer. 2008 8:226–226. [Internet] Disponível em: //www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/226. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Bicalho MB, Lopes MHBM. Impacto da incontinência urinária na vida de esposas de homens com incontinência: Revisão integrativa. [Revisão] [acesso 12 dez 2012]; Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2012 46(4):1009–1014. Disponível em: //www.scielo.br/pdf/reeusp/v46n4/32.pdf. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Mistiaen P, Poot E. Telephone follow-up, initiated by a hospital-based health professional, for post discharge problems in patients discharged from hospital to home. [Rewiew] [acesso 2 nov 2012];Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 18(4) Disponível em: //www.thecochranelibrary.com . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Rodríguez-Gázquez MA, Arredondo-Holguín E, Herrera-Cortés R. Effectiveness of an educational program in nursing in the self-care of patients with heart failure: randomized controlled trial. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2012;20(2):296–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Thompson-Coon J, Abdul-Rahman A, Whear R, Bethel A, Vaidya B, Gericke CA, et al. Telephone consultations in place of face to face out-patient consultations for patients discharged from hospital following surgery: A systematic review [Revisão] [acesso 14 abril 2013];BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 13:128–128. Disponível em: //www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/13/128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration ; 2009. [acesso 3 nov 2012]. Disponível em: www.cochrane-handbook.org. [Google Scholar]

15. Moore KN, Valiquette L, Chetner MP, Byrniak S, Herbison GP. Return to continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: A randomized trial of verbal and written instructions versus therapist-directed pelvic floor muscle therapy. [acesso 11 dez 2012];Urology. 2008 72(6):1280–1286. [Internet] Disponível em: //www.goldjournal.net/article/S0090-4295%2807%2902605-2/pdf . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Inman DM, Maxson PM, Johnson KM, Myers RP, Holland DE. The impact of follow-up educational telephone calls on patients after radical prostatectomy: Finding value in low-margin activities. [acesso 10 dez 2012];Urol Nurs. 2011 31(2):83–91. [Internet] Disponível em: //www.medscape.com/viewarticle/746332. [Google Scholar]

17. Jensen BT, Kristensen SA, Christensen SV, Borre M. Efficacy of tele-nursing consultations in rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: A randomised controlled trial study. [acesso 11 dez 2012];Int J Urol Nurs. 2011 5(3):123–130. [Internet] Disponível em: //onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-771X.2011.01130.x/pdf. [Google Scholar]

18. Mishel MH, Belyea M, Germino BB, Stewart JL, Bailey DE, Robertson C, et al. Helping patients with localized prostate carcinoma manage uncertainty and treatment side effects. [acesso 13 dez 2012];Cancer. 2002 94(6):1854–1866. [Internet] Disponível em: //onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.10390/pdf. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Campbell LC, Keefe FJ, Scipio C, McKee DC, Edwards CL, Herman SH, et al. Facilitating research participation and improving quality of life for African American prostate cancer survivors and their intimate partners. A pilot study of telephone-based coping skills training. [acesso 9 dez 2012];Cancer. 2007 109(2) Suppl:414–424. [Internet] Disponível em: //onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.22355/pdf. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Duhamel KN, Mosher CE, Winkel G, Labay LE, Rini C, Meschian YM, et al. Randomized clinical trial of telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy to reduce post-traumatic stress disorder and distress symptoms after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. [acesso 12 mar 2013];J Clin Oncol. 2010 28(23):3754–3761. [Internet] Disponível em: //jco.ascopubs.org/content/28/23/3754.full.pdf. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem are provided here courtesy of Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo